Project Management
Important concepts:
Stages of product life cycle
Features of Present value method
Stages involved in execution of a project
Concept of project appraisal
Steps involved in pert analysis
Concept of financial analysis
Feasibly report
Average rate of return
Project appraisal report
Techniques of Risk Analysis
Concept of Project Report
Process of Project Selection
Procedure of CPM Analysis
Source of Project Ideas
Classification of Project
Part A Q&A:
1. Explain the various classification of Project?
The projects can
be classified into various types:
1) Based on
Ownership
a)
Public Projects: These are the projects which are done by public
projects. E.g. Construction of Roads & Bridges, Adult Education Programmes,
etc.
b)
Private Projects: These are the projects which are undertaken by private
enterprises. Eg. Any business related projects such as a construction of houses
by real estate builders, software development, marriage contracts, etc.
c)
Public Private Partnerships: These projects which are undertaken by both
government and private enterprises together. E.g., Generation of Electricity by
Windmill, Garbage Collection, etc.
2) Based on
Investment
a)
Large Scale Project: These
projects involve a huge outlay or investments, say, crores. Eg. Real Estate
Projects, Road Construction of manufacturing facilities, Satellite sending
projects of ISRO, Unique Identification Number project of India, etc.
b)
Medium Scale Project: These projects involve medium level investment and
are technology oriented. Example: Computer industry and electronic industry.
c)
Small Scale Project: These
projects involve only a lesser investments. E.g., agricultural projects,
manufacturing projects.
3) Based on
Research in Academia
a)
Major Projects:
In academia, the major projects are those projects which involve more than one
year to 3 or 5 years and minimum funding of ` 3 lakhs in case of social
sciences and ` 5 lakh in case of sciences.
b)
Minor Projects: The minor projects in academia are those projects which
will be completed within a year and have a maximum funding of ` 1 lakh in
social science and ` 3 lakh in case of sciences.
4) Based on
Sector
a)
Agricultural Projects: These are the projects which are related to
agricultural sector like irrigation projects, well digging projects, maturing
projects, soil upgrading project, etc.
b)
Industrial Projects: These
are the projects which are related to the industrial manufacturing sectors like
cement industry, steel industry, textile industry, etc. For example, technology
transfer project, marketing project, capital issue project like IPO, etc.
c)
Service Projects: These
are the projects which are related to the services sectors like education,
tourism, health, public utilities, etc. For example, adult literacy project,
medical camp, general health check up camp, etc.
5) Based on
Objective
a) Commercial
Projects:
These projects are undertaken for commercial purpose and return on investment
is expected out these projects. For example, Toll roads based on BOLT – Build
Own Lease Transfer Model or BOOT – Build Own Operate and Transfer Model,
Product Launching project.
b)
Social Projects:
These projects are undertaken for social purposes and welfare of the people is
the aim of these projects. These projects are undertaken either by the
Government or Service oriented Non- Governmental Organizations. For example,
Polio immunization Project, Child Welfare Projects, Adult Literacy Projects,
etc.
6) Based on
Nature
a)
Conventional Projects:
These projects are traditional projects which do not apply any innovative ideas
or technology or method. For example, conventional irrigational projects,
handicraft projects, etc.
b)
Innovative Projects:
These projects involve the use of technology, high R&D, development of new
products and services. These innovative projects can be further classified into
i)
Technology:
Depending on the level of technological uncertainty at the time of initiation
of projects, the projects can be classified into: Low-Tech projects
which relay on the existing and well established base technologies; Medium-Tech
projects which rest mainly on existing base technologies but incorporate
some new technology or feature; High-Tech projects in which most of the
technologies employed are new, but existent, having been developed prior to the
project’s initiation; and Super High- Tech projects which are based
primarily on new, not entirely existent technologies.
ii)
Research:
Based on the type of research, projects can be classified into: Exploratory research
projects which may generate novel idea in the domain of knowledge;
constructive research projects which are mainly done by many technological
corporate to find new or alternative solutions to any particular crisis or
problems, eg., renewable energy research or development of the capacity of
optical fiber; and Empirical research projects are very impressive
observational type of research in which testing on real life data or analysis
of pattern of some specific events in order to identify the nature or the class
of trend that specific phenomenon maintains.
iii)
New product development: These projects are undertaken in the life cycle of
a product. These projects can be classified into advance development
projects which aim at inventing new science or capturing new know-how for
the organization; breakthrough development projects which create the
first generation of an entirely new product and involve significant change in
the product and process technology; platform or next generation development
projects which provide a basis for a product and process family and thus
establish the basic architecture for follow-on derivative projects; and
derivative development projects which refine and improve selected
performance dimensions.
7)
Based on Time
a)
Long term projects: These projects take a very long duration to
complete. These projects are run for many years till the objective is reached.
For example, Eradication of diseases like Polio, Filaria, etc.
b)
Medium term projects: These projects take a medium term duration like 3
to 5 years. For example, Modernization projects, computerization of operations,
etc.
c)
Short term projects: These projects are executed within a short period,
normally within a year. For example, Pond cleaning project, health camps,
software development, etc.
d)
Very short term projects: By very name you can understand that these projects
are completed within a very short period, say, within a day. For example,
product launch project.
8)
Based on Functions
Based on the
functional area of management, the projects can be classified into:
a)
Marketing Projects which are taken up in the area of marketing a product
or service of an organization. Marketing road shows, implementing a marketing
strategy, etc.
b)
Financial Projects are undertaken to raise finance or restructure
capital structure. For example, IPO Project, share split project, etc.
c)
Human Resources Projects are undertaken in the area of human resources
of an organization, e.g., Induction training project, campus recruitment
project, etc.
d)
IT and Technology Projects which are undertaken in the area of IT
companies or IT related requirement of any organization, e.g., development of
Human Resources Information System, Marketing Information System, etc.
e)
Production Projects are undertaken in the area of production or operations.
For example, overhauling projects, preventive maintenance projects, getting an
ISO certification, etc.
f)
Strategic Projects are taken by the organizations to executive a
strategy, for example, mergers and acquisition projects, Core Banking Solution
project introduced in banks, etc.
9)
Based on Risk
a)
High Risk Projects: These
projects involve a very high degree of risk, for example, nuclear energy
project, thermal energy project, satellite projects, etc. If the project is not
handled properly, the effect will be very adverse. Thus, high precautionary
measures are to be taken to commission these projects.
b)
Low Risk Projects: These
projects do not involve risk and they are carried out in the normal course of
action. For example, road and bridge construction, house construction.
10)
Based on Investment Decisions
On the basis how
the projects influence the investment decision products, project can be
classified into
a)
Independent Projects:
An independent project is one, where the acceptance or rejection does not
directly eliminate other projects from consideration or affect the likelihood
of their selection. For example, if management plans to introduce a new product
line, as well as, replace a machine which is currently producing a different
product. These two projects can be considered independent of each other, if there
are sufficient resources to adopt both, provided, they meet the firm’s
investment criteria.
b)
Mutually exclusive Projects: The mutually exclusive projects are
projects that cannot be followed at the same time. The acceptance of one
prevents the substitute proposal from accepting. Most of them have ‘either or’
decisions. You will not be able to follow more than one project at the same
time. The evaluation is done on a separate basis so that one that brings the
highest value to the company is chosen.
c)
Contingent Projects: A
contingent project is one where the acceptance or rejection depends on the
decision to accept or reject multiple numbers of other projects. Such projects
may be complementary or substitutes. Let us take the example of bio fuel plant
cultivation in a large scale and the decision to set up a bio fuel
manufacturing unit. In this case, the projects are complementary to each other.
The cash flows of the plant cultivation will be enhanced by the existence of a
nearby manufacturing plant. Conversely, the cash flows of the manufacturing
unit will be enhanced by the existence of a nearby cultivation farm.
11)
Based on Output
Based on output,
projects are classified into quantifiable and non-quantifiable ones.
a)
Quantifiable
projects:
In these projects, the benefits / goals of which are amenable for measurement.
Quantitative expression of the outcomes is possible. It is easy to understand
and appreciate quantitative projects as it is easy to communicate them. For
instance, enterprises engaged in the production of various goods and services
come under this category.
b)
Non-quantifiable projects: In these projects quantification of the benefits /
outcome may not always be possible as the impact of the project is spread over
a longer period. The benefits accrue to the intended beneficiaries in the long
run. Projects concerning health, education, and environment fall under this
category.
12)
Based on Techno-Economic Characteristics
Based on the
technology intensity, size of the investment, and scope of the project,
projects are also classified as techno-economic projects. For instance, the
United Nations Organization (UNO) and its various developmental agencies use
the Standard Industrial Classification of all economic activities in collection
and compilation of economic data regarding projects. On the basis of
Techno-economic factors, projects can be further classified into a) Factor
Intensity Oriented; b) Causation Oriented and c) Magnitude Oriented.
a)
Factor Intensity Projects: It
is anybody’s knowledge that some projects are capital intensive while some are
labour intensive. However, as technological advancements are taking place in
every sector in a big way, many projects are becoming more technology intensive
and less labour intensive. The gestation period of some of the projects also is
quite long. Large scale investments are made
in
the plant and machinery. Economies of scale and the associated cost
competitiveness also prompt the establishment of large scale organizations.
b)
Causation-Oriented Projects: The availability of a particular raw
material in abundance in a particular region could be the reason for conceiving
projects at times. To make use of the locally available raw material, skilled
workforce and to promote development of a backward region, some projects are
conceived and formulated. Similarly, in a few cases, where the supply of a
particular good falls short of demand necessitating imports from abroad,
entrepreneurial projects are conceived. Thus, in some case, the existing
demand for goods and services cause the establishment of business organizations.
The demand pull plays a dominant role in such projects.
c)
Magnitude Oriented Projects: Based on the size of the project, projects
may be classified under large, medium and small scale projects. The size of the
investment, gestation period, employment generation, etc. is some of the
factors that influence the size of the project.
13)
Based on Financial Institutions’ Classification
Financial
institutions – both central and state level have classified projects into
profit-oriented projects and service-oriented projects.
a)
Profit-Oriented Projects: They are classified into a) New Projects; b)
Expansion Projects or Development projects; c) Modernization Projects or
Technology Projects and d) Diversification Projects.
b)
Service-Oriented Projects:
They are classified into a) Welfare Projects; b) Service Projects; c) Research
and Development Projects and d) Educational Projects.
2. Write a short
note on
1. Cost benefit
Ratio:
The benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR) is a
financial ratio that's used to determine whether the amount of money made
through a project will be greater than the costs incurred in executing the
project. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then the project does not deliver
value for money under the assumed conditions. The benefit-to-cost ratio has two
elements: the benefits of a project or proposal, and the costs of the project
or proposal. Qualitative factors, such as the benefit a project might have to
society, should be expressed in monetary terms where possible to ensure an
accurate result.
Benefit Cost Ratio
Benefit Cost Ratio (B/C ratio) or
Cost Benefit Ratio is another criteria for project investment and is defined as
present value of net positive cash flow divided by net negative cash flow at
i*.
Benefit Cost Ratio=PV of Net Positive Cash Flow/PV of Net Negative Cash Flow
Or
Excess Present
Value Index (Or Benefits Cost (B/C) Ratio)
= PV of future
cash inflows x 100
PV of future
cash outflows
Excess
Present Value Index provides ready comparison between investment proposals of
different magnitudes.
Example: A company has `
30, 00,000 allocated for capital budgeting purposes. The following proposals
and associated profitability indices have been determined:
Project
|
Amount
|
Profitability
Index
|
1
|
9,00,000
|
1.22
|
2
|
4,50,000
|
0.95
|
3
|
10,50,000
|
1.2
|
Project
|
Amount
|
Profitability Index
|
4
|
1350000
|
1.18
|
5
|
600000
|
1.2
|
6
|
1200000
|
1.05
|
Which of the
above investments should be undertaken? Assume that projects are indivisible
and there is no alternative use of money allocated for capital budgeting.
Solution
Statement of
Ranking of Projects on the Basis of Profitability Index
|
||||||||
Project
|
Amount
|
Profitability
Index
|
Rank
|
|||||
1
|
900000
|
1.22
|
1
|
|||||
2
|
450000
|
0.95
|
5
|
|||||
3
|
1050000
|
1.2
|
2
|
|||||
4
|
1350000
|
1.18
|
3
|
|||||
5
|
600000
|
1.2
|
2
|
|||||
6
|
1200000
|
1.05
|
4
|
|||||
Project
|
Amount
(in `)
|
Profitability Index
|
Cash inflows of project (`)
|
NPV of Project
(in `)
|
||||
A
|
B
|
C
|
D = A * B
|
E= D - B
|
||||
5
|
6,00,000
|
1.2
|
7,20,000
|
1,20,000
|
||||
6
|
12,00,000
|
1.05
|
12,60,000
|
60,000
|
||||
The
above table shows that the allocation of funds to the projects 1, 3 and 5 (as
selected according to P.I.) will give NPV of ` 5,28,000 (198000 + 210000 +
120000) and ` 4,50,000 [3000000 - (900000 + 1050000 + 600000) will remain
unspent. However, the NPV of the project 3, 4 and 5 is ` 573000which is more
than the NPV of projects 1, 3 and 5. Moreover, by undertaking projects 3, 4 and
5 no money will remain unspent. Hence, the company is advised to undertake
investment in projects 3, 4 and 5.
2. Internal Rate of
Return:
The internal rate of return (IRR) is a discounting cash flow
technique which gives a rate of return earned by a project. The internal rate
of return is the discounting rate where the total of initial cash outlay and
discounted cash inflows are equal to zero. In other words, it is the discounting
rate at which the net present value(NPV) is equal to zero.

3. Average rate of Return:
The
term “average rate of return” refers to the percentage rate of return that is expected
on an investment or asset vis-Ã -vis the initial investment cost or average
investment over the life of the project. The formula for average rate of return
is derived by dividing the average annual net earnings after taxes or return on
the investment by the original investment or the average investment during the
life of the project and then expressed in terms of percentage.

The Fine Clothing Factory wants to replace an old
machine with a new one. The old machine can be sold to a small factory for
$10,000. The new machine would increase annual revenue by $150,000 and annual
operating expenses by $60,000. The new machine would cost $360,000. The
estimated useful life of the machine is 12 years with zero salvage value.
Required:
1.
Compute
accounting rate of return (ARR) of the machine using above information.
2.
Should
Fine Clothing Factory purchase the machine if management wants an accounting
rate of return of 15% on all capital investments?
Solution:
(1): Computation of accounting rate of return:
= $60,000* / $350,000**
= 17.14%
*Incremental net operating income:
Incremental revenues – Incremental expenses including depreciation
$150,000 – ($60,000 cash operating expenses + $30,000 depreciation)
$150,000 – $90,000
$60,000
Incremental revenues – Incremental expenses including depreciation
$150,000 – ($60,000 cash operating expenses + $30,000 depreciation)
$150,000 – $90,000
$60,000
** The amount of initial investment has been
reduced by net realizable value of the old machine ($360,000 – $10,000).
(2). Conclusion:
According to accounting rate of return method, the
Fine Clothing Factory should purchases the machine because its estimated
accounting rate of return is 17.14% which is greater than the management’s
desired rate of return of 15%.
3. Describe project portfolio management?
Project
Portfolio Management System (PPM) is a term used by project managers and
project management (PM) organizations, (or PMO’s), to describe methods for
analysing and collectively managing a group of current or proposed projects
based on numerous key characteristics. The fundamental objective of PPM is to
determine the optimal mix and sequencing of proposed projects to best achieve
the organization’s overall goals - typically expressed in terms of hard
economic measures, business strategy goals, or technical strategy goals - while
honouring constraints imposed by management or external real-world factors.
Typical attributes of projects being analysed in a PPM process include each
project’s total expected cost, consumption of scarce resources (human or otherwise)
expected timeline and schedule of investment, expected nature, magnitude and
timing of benefits to be realized, and relationship or inter-dependencies with
other projects in the portfolio.
Thus,
Project Portfolio Management is about more than running multiple projects. Each
portfolio of projects needs to be assessed by its business value and adherence
to strategy. The portfolio should be designed to achieve a defined business
objective or benefit. Project management guru Bob Buttrick summarized it when
he said; “Directing the individual project correctly will ensure it is done
right. Directing ‘all the projects’ successfully will ensure we are doing the
right projects.” Project portfolio management organizes a series of projects
into a single portfolio of reports that capture project objectives and other
critical factors. While at individual project level it is important to know how
each project is performing, the impact of each project on the portfolio is also
important.
4. How do you
differentiate between leading and managing the project?
5. Differentiate between CPM and PERT?
BASIS FOR COMPARISON
|
PERT
|
CPM
|
Meaning
|
PERT is a project management
technique, used to manage uncertain activities of a project.
|
CPM is a statistical technique of
project management that manages well defined activities of a project.
|
What is it?
|
A technique of planning and control
of time.
|
A method to control cost and time.
|
Orientation
|
Event-oriented
|
Activity-oriented
|
Evolution
|
Evolved as Research &
Development project
|
Evolved as Construction project
|
Model
|
Probabilistic Model
|
Deterministic Model
|
Focuses on
|
Time
|
Time-cost trade-off
|
Estimates
|
Three time estimates
|
One time estimate
|
Appropriate for
|
High precision time estimate
|
Reasonable time estimate
|
Management of
|
Unpredictable Activities
|
Predictable activities
|
Nature of jobs
|
Non-repetitive nature
|
Repetitive nature
|
Critical and Non-critical
activities
|
No differentiation
|
Differentiated
|
Suitable for
|
Research and Development Project
|
Non-research projects like civil construction,
ship building etc.
|
Crashing concept
|
Not Applicable
|
Applicable
|
6. Explain the components of Project feasibility
study?
A project feasibility study is a report that
investigates the viability of a project. It seeks to provide its stakeholders with
an analysis that results in a go/no-go decision.
Feasibility studies are performed in a variety of
industries. They are prominent in the oil & gas, mining, or renewable
energy industries, or manufacturing industry for new plant investments.
They are performed wherever a large capital expenditure for a project must be
approved by the executive or board.
Feasibility studies are usually carried out by major
engineering firms who have the multi-disciplinary expertise on all the major
project issues like project design, economics, environmental, logistics,
stakeholder, regulatory requirements, and so forth.
A project feasibility study involves performing the
detailed project design to a level that can justify a final project
decision. Although it varies by industry, this is usually around 80% –
100% complete. In terms of project cost, it varies from around 5% – 15%.
The contents of a project feasibility study are:
§ Design Summary
§ Economics
§ Geopolitical
§ Environmental
§ Historical
§ Social
Design Summary
The feasibility study must perform the project design
to a minimum level that allows the executives or board to make a final decision
to proceed with the project.
The project cost must be estimated to a
level that:
§ Is sufficient to obtain project
financing
§ Is sufficient to make a final
project go/no-go decision
On the impact side, the design must be sufficiently
complete to ensure that all of the project’s impacts are well known:
§ Environmental
§ Social
§ Geopolitical
In most industries, many studies are produced prior to
the final feasibility study. In major industrial projects, for example, a
scoping study or pre-feasibility study will assess the economics of one or two
major factors that are driving the project’s viability. However, they
generally serve only as a guideline used to proceed to the next phase, rather
than a definitive investigation of the viability of the project.
Typically, if there is a processing plant the size and
throughput of the plant is finalized. If there is a production item like
a solar farm the number and size of units are finalized. For a mine, the
mining and processing rates are finalized.
The manpower and project schedule are analysed,
and the transportation and logistics are planned out. In short, every
item that has a possibility of derailing the project is investigated to ensure
it does not pose a risk to project success. Or if it does, the
stakeholders are proceeding with full knowledge of that risk.
Although the project design is often completed as part
of the feasibility study, the design details are usually not included in their
entirety because they are not the main focus of the report. Rather, the
project design is summarized within the feasibility study to give the readers
context. Approval of the final design details comes after the feasibility
decision phase.
Economics
The most important part of a feasibility study is the
economics. Economics is the reason most projects are undertaken (with
some exceptions for government and non-profit projects in which a cost
benefit analysis is the primary tool).
Simply put, none of the other feasibility criteria
matter if the project does not generate a return on investment.
The economic feasibility of a project is determined
by:
§ Estimating
the project costs
Because the design is mostly complete, each item is estimated using comparisons to previous projects (analogous estimating) or unit rate averages from various sources (parametric estimating). These project costs are agglomerated into an overall project estimate (bottom up estimating) to determine the overall capital cost of the project.
Because the design is mostly complete, each item is estimated using comparisons to previous projects (analogous estimating) or unit rate averages from various sources (parametric estimating). These project costs are agglomerated into an overall project estimate (bottom up estimating) to determine the overall capital cost of the project.
§ Estimating
revenue
the revenue generated from the project is usually alot less certain than the capital cost of the plant. For that reason, feasibility studies usually evaluate several different scenarios, for example high-medium-low or optimistic/pessimistic scenarios. If there is an underlying commodity price, like the price of crude oil, a discount from the current price is usually applied to account for potential price volatility. Risk analysis is an important component of this step, since there are usually many risk events that could impact the project’s revenue stream.
the revenue generated from the project is usually alot less certain than the capital cost of the plant. For that reason, feasibility studies usually evaluate several different scenarios, for example high-medium-low or optimistic/pessimistic scenarios. If there is an underlying commodity price, like the price of crude oil, a discount from the current price is usually applied to account for potential price volatility. Risk analysis is an important component of this step, since there are usually many risk events that could impact the project’s revenue stream.
§ Estimating
operations and maintenance costs
the ongoing yearly costs of the facility once constructed are estimated and enter the analysis together with the capital (one-time) cost. Usually, but not always, this is known with a fairly strong degree of certainty and contingency factors are not necessary.
the ongoing yearly costs of the facility once constructed are estimated and enter the analysis together with the capital (one-time) cost. Usually, but not always, this is known with a fairly strong degree of certainty and contingency factors are not necessary.
§ Capital
budgeting techniques
the feasibility study considers all of the capital inflows and outflows accounting for the time value of money. Metrics such as the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and payback period are calculated to give the decision makers the necessary information to approve or cancel the project.
the feasibility study considers all of the capital inflows and outflows accounting for the time value of money. Metrics such as the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and payback period are calculated to give the decision makers the necessary information to approve or cancel the project.
The first thing the decision makers usually look at
are the three main capital budgeting figures:
1.
Net Present Value
The current value, in today’s currency, of the full stream of cash flows (positive and negative) assuming a discount rate that takes into account the time value of money and the organization’s opportunity cost.
The current value, in today’s currency, of the full stream of cash flows (positive and negative) assuming a discount rate that takes into account the time value of money and the organization’s opportunity cost.
2.
Internal Rate of Return
The percentage return generated by the project, which is comparable to a stock market return.
The percentage return generated by the project, which is comparable to a stock market return.
3.
Payback Period
The length of time it takes to recover the initial investment.
The length of time it takes to recover the initial investment.
Geopolitical
Political considerations are a factor in the
feasibility of many projects. Although it is rare that government
regulation causes a project to be rejected outright, it is not uncommon that
they cause project changes which increase the project budget or affect the
completion date.
In addition, the geopolitical landscape can change
very quickly, and should be assumed to change for projects that require more
than a year of planning.
Project managers need to continually ask
themselves what is the appetite for the project among the political
class. Sensitive sectors include:
§ Oil and gas
§ Mining
§ Renewable energy
§ Electric vehicles
In these industries, change is a constant. But
do not assume that change occurs only in one direction. A new government
can, and has, wiped out many projects that are in a trendy niche.
Hence, a feasibility study should investigate the odds
of obtaining regulatory approval for the project, and what the future changes
to those regulations are anticipated to be.
Environmental
In this day and age, environmental regulations are
integral to project feasibility. There are many environmental regulations
that could derail a project if a project manager is not familiar with their
project’s environmental footprint. Major projects must plan for stakeholder
engagement since any one stakeholder can revolt and stop the project.
In most jurisdictions, environmental reviews must be
completed for any construction work that involves disturbing a site.
These reviews require monitoring and establishing a baseline for a variety of
ecosystem components, which include:
§ Soils and erosion
§ Vegetation (grasses, bushes, and
trees)
§ Wetlands
§ Wildlife
§ Fish
§ Hydrology and storm water
§ Water quality
§ Air quality
§ Groundwater
§ Noise
§ Navigation
§ Cultural resources
Historical
You might be surprised how many projects are
commissioned without a proper idea of who tried the same thing, how long ago,
and whether or not they were successful. Success is often relative –
maybe they succeeded partially and there are good lessons learned for the
current project manager.
Even if it doesn’t swing the project feasibility, the
previous lessons learned could significantly reduce the cost or schedule of the
project.
This is one of the most underrated areas of project
feasibility because there is almost always someone who has done (or is doing)
something nearby, or at an earlier time period, which provides tremendous
insight into the project.
Most mining or oil and gas projects perform an
extensive desktop investigation into the mining history at the site, taken from
government records and files. This is an important component of the
feasibility study as it gives the executives a context in which to make the
decision to approve the project.
Likewise, solar and wind farms must measure and analyse
the amount of resource at the site. Data from nearby existing operations,
or monitoring stations that didn’t result in developments, are priceless
information for project feasibility.
Social
Many projects have a societal impact that is an
integral component of project feasibility. Even if the societal impacts
are moderate and unlikely to be the determining factor in project feasibility,
they can factor into project budgets and schedules.
Societal impacts are often difficult to quantify prior
to a project decision. Although it is often not possible to get societal
buy-in prior to approving the project, it should be addressed to the maximum
extent possible to make a project decision.
Stakeholders who are opposed to the project should
be identified and classified into five categories:
1.
Unaware
2.
Opposed
3.
Neutral
4.
Supportive
5.
Leading
(actively promoting the project)
